65% funny, 100% pointless

I didn’t know when the next time I would write was going to be. And I didn’t it was going to be this. But for what it’s worth, here.

  What word would you use to describe the way the movie Prince Caspian compared with The Lion, the Witch, adn the Wardrobe?   Well, you can take that term, and apply it to Night at the Museum: Battle at the Smithsonian and it might fit.

  Then again, that might be a bit strong. This film was far from top notch, but so was the first one. And of amongst all the continuations of stupid franchises that have been released every weekend this season,  this one starts to look pretty good. (That’s always the way Hollywood works: by relativity).

  Picking up two years after where the first one left off, this film find Larry Daley (Ben Stiller) at the top of his game. He has quit his job as a night  guard, and is now running his innovation company (like he dreamed of before). And he has less and less to spend with his somewhat embittered friend at the Museum of Natural History. So he is surprised when he finds out that all his old friends- Jedediah the cowboy, Octavious, Sacagawea, Dexter the Capuchin, Attila the Hun, etc, etc.- are being boxed up and sent to the Smithsonian’s archives, to be  replaced by new technology. (as a side note, this is hugely accurate, in that more and more museums are morphing into interpretive centres). There is one final reunion, then they’re all packed away. Without the Tablet from the first one.

   Imagine Larry’s surprise, then, when the next night Jed calls him and tells him that Dexter has stolen the Akmunrah tablet, and now the biggest museum on earth is coming to life. And apparently, an evil Pharaoh, Kahmunrah (who has a lisp), has plans to take over…..

   True to the first one, the new Night  is packed with goofy humour. But while it exceeded in quantity, it slumped in quality. I laughed out loud while in the theatre, but little of the humour was mature. What kept a slight air of sophisticated fun were the historic figures: The dozen or so Einstein bobble-heads (hee hee), Amelia Earhart, General Custer (heh heh), and the compatriots of the evil Pharaoh: Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, and Al Capone. Other new character or items would include a space monkey, the Thinker, paintings, skeletons, animals, and Cupids. These, along with all the characters from the first, set the stage for a Chronicles of Narnia style battle scene at the end, only funnier.

   Of course, having more of almost everything than the first one, it’s  only fitting that this movie should be more annoying and in some ways more stupid.   A pointless romance between Larry and the feministic Amelia is shoved in. Abraham Lincoln is given airtime, enough to shoo away a crowd of creatures that Kahmunrah has called from the “underworld” with the Tablet. And to some extent, the whole shape of the movie was pointless, since instead of a climactic battle it would have been a lot easier for Larry just to wait till dawn and fix things then. And of course, like the first, this film pushes a feel good Hollywood message, this time about doing what you love.

    So, on a scale of one to five, Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is a 2.5. But, then again, in the genre of action comedies of this type, it would have to be moved up once. My advice: If you liked the first one, and want a funny view, you should…wait for the DVD. 

  1. #1 by Katie on May 29, 2009 - 8:09 am

    I really liked the first one. I almost went and saw #2 at the theatre a few nights ago, but decided to stay at home and see Bride Wars instead. Now, there’s a stupid movie what is a stupid movie! I lost at least 5 brain cells during it, although the acting was good.

  2. #2 by "Jake" on May 29, 2009 - 3:21 pm

    “Now, there’s a stupid movie what is a stupid movie! I lost at least 5 brain cells during it, although the acting was good.”
    It looked stupid. And since it has Anne Hathaway in it, the acting must be good. I bet that mine was better.

  3. #3 by maidenoftheroses on June 5, 2009 - 4:27 pm

    Katie, I decided not to watch “Bride Wars” after reading about it on Plugged in Online (as a sidenote which not everyone would approve of, I concluded that the PG-13 rated “Last Chance Harvey” looked better…still haven’t seen it though).

    Frank, *looks around* I’ll probably watch Night at the Museum 2 again, even though it’s not perfect.

  4. #4 by Jake on June 6, 2009 - 9:29 pm

    I will too. It’s more than not perfect, it’s painful.But despite what the song says, we will be fooled again. And i think………………..FRANK?!

  5. #5 by ellie on June 14, 2009 - 4:43 pm

    *thinks miscieveously about what name to give Jennifer*
    *thinks about her liking Jenny. Crosses that one off the mental list*
    *thinks about Fred*
    *doesn’t think last names should be allowed. Crosses that one off the mental list*
    *thinks of one*
    *says this:*
    “Lynnie, *looks around* I have not seen N.A.T.M. 2, but we will probably rent it some time. What is your vote?
    a) ‘yuck. don’t watch it.’
    b) ‘you’ll never see a better.’
    c) ’50/50′
    d) ‘you’ll might just end up watching it no matter what I say. especially if all of the rest of our family watches it. so why would I bother’ (although I didn’t watch spiderman, did I? (not including those parts))
    Ellie *just wasted time writing this*

  6. #6 by Mr iDeal on June 14, 2009 - 5:05 pm

    an iDeal vote:
    At this point, probably “a” or “d.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

  • an overarching philosophy (for me, anyway)

    "I find that when I am most helped, I write: and that by writing, I am helped." Augustine of Hippo
  • sithlordbfw
  • Quote of the Day

    “We love the old saints, missionaries, martyrs, and reformers. Our Luthers, Bunyans, Wesleys and Asburys, etc... We will write their biographies, reverence their memories, frame their epitaphs, and build their monuments. We will do anything except imitate them. We cherish the last drop of their blood, but watch carefully over the first drop of our own.”
    - A. W. Tozer
  • My archives: a three-year treasure chest of, well, rambling

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 17 other followers

  • Mostviewed(recently)(onthissiteanyway)

  • Lately

    May 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Apr   Jun »
  • a

  • Top Rated

  • Today’s Hits and Yesterday’s Favourites

    SermonAudio.com MP3 Sermons

%d bloggers like this: